Skip to content

Conversation

@ognick
Copy link

@ognick ognick commented Nov 24, 2025

GOscade is a minimalistic lifecycle orchestrator for Go services and components. It provides dependency graphs, startup sequencing, readiness coordination, and graceful shutdown. The library is lightweight, idiomatic, actively maintained, and fully documented.

Forge link: https://github.com/ognick/goscade
pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/ognick/goscade

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

  • The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
  • The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
  • The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
  • The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
  • The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
  • Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

Pull Request content

  • The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
  • The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
  • As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

  • The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README to include goscade, a Go Goroutine orchestration tool, in the Goroutines section with its key features and capabilities.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

GOscade is a minimalistic lifecycle orchestrator for Go services and components.
It provides dependency graphs, startup sequencing, readiness coordination,
and graceful shutdown. The library is lightweight, idiomatic, actively maintained,
and fully documented.

Forge link: https://github.com/ognick/goscade
pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/ognick/goscade
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A single entry for the goscade Go orchestration tool was added to the Goroutines section of README.md, describing its lifecycle management capabilities including dependency graphs, startup sequencing, and graceful shutdown features.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Added goscade entry to Goroutines section with description of lifecycle orchestration features

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • phanirithvij
  • bukarumar147

Poem

🐰 A new tool hops into sight,
Goscade dances left and right,
Goroutines in harmony align,
Orchestration so divine,
The README now shines so bright! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding GOscade to the Goroutines section of the README.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2698e59 and 23a401f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
README.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

README.md: When modifying the Awesome list, keep categories with at least three entries
Descriptions in the Awesome list must end with a period
Avoid promotional copy; keep descriptions concise and neutral in the Awesome list
Do not remove existing list content unless removal is requested and justified

Files:

  • README.md
**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Keep documentation in English

Files:

  • README.md
{README.md,COVERAGE.md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Align rendered documentation (README.md, COVERAGE.md, etc.) with behavior changes in main.go or helper packages

Files:

  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: quality
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

1356-1356: LGTM: entry is compliant and correctly placed.

  • Alphabetical position is correct (between gollback and gowl).
  • Description is concise, neutral, English, and ends with a period.
  • Category already has many entries; no quota issues.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

  • Repo: OK
  • pkg.go.dev: OK
  • goreportcard: OK (grade unknown)
  • coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

fyyhpyrvjb-lang

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants